HunterAlphaHub
OpenRouter model reference Facts from the public catalogue, dated and labelled
Jev Laya Verified
2026-10-10

Head to head · OpenRouter

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Identical on paper where it counts: both list $2 in / $10 out per million, a ~1M-token window, a 128K output ceiling and text, image and file input. The difference is the vendor line — Anthropic's balanced tier against OpenAI's mid-tier — and the cache price, where Claude's cached read is $0.10 against OpenAI's $0.10.

Comparison Snapshot 2026-10-10 All models compared →

Quick verdict

There is no price argument here, which makes it a rare clean A/B: run your own prompts through both and pick on output. The catalogue's own positioning says Sonnet 5.5 is for well-scoped everyday work and GPT-6.1 Sol for agentic coding and document-heavy professional work — that is a hint about the intended shape of the workload, not a benchmark.

Side-by-side comparison

Field Claude Sonnet 5.5 GPT-6.1 Sol
Provider Anthropic OpenAI
Context window 1M tokens 1.05M tokens
Input / 1M $2.00 $2.00
Output / 1M $10.00 $10.00
Modalities Text, Vision, Files Text, Vision, Files
Best for Overall, Coding, Agents Overall, Coding, Agents
Source openrouter.ai/api/v1/models Verified 2026-10-10

Cost estimates

Workload Input Output Claude Sonnet 5.5 GPT-6.1 Sol
Quick test 20,000 5,000 $0.090 $0.090
Product chat month 500,000 125,000 $2.25 $2.25
Document batch 5,000,000 1,000,000 $20.00 $20.00

Estimates use list input/output prices and exclude cache discounts, provider surcharges and tool fees.

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 if

  • ✓ Your work is well-scoped product work: features, bug fixes, reviewable diffs
  • ✓ You already build on the Claude line and want the upgrade path to stay short
  • ✓ You care about consistent instruction-following more than raw breadth

View Claude Sonnet 5.5 on OpenRouter ↗

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol if

  • ✓ The workload is agentic or document-heavy rather than conversational
  • ✓ You want the OpenAI tool-calling and structured-output behaviour
  • ✓ You are already running GPT-6 Luna and want a same-family step up

View GPT-6.1 Sol on OpenRouter ↗

FAQ

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 input and $10.00 output per 1M tokens. GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2.00 input and $10.00 output per 1M tokens.

Which model has the larger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 offers 1M tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol offers 1.05M tokens. Provider-specific limits can vary by route.

Which one should I choose?

There is no price argument here, which makes it a rare clean A/B: run your own prompts through both and pick on output. The catalogue's own positioning says Sonnet 5.5 is for well-scoped everyday work and GPT-6.1 Sol for agentic coding and document-heavy professional work — that is a hint about the intended shape of the workload, not a benchmark.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 details GPT-6.1 Sol details Estimate monthly cost

Pricing and context data are based on a 2026-10-10 snapshot. Provider limits and pricing can change; verify on OpenRouter before production.

Send us a link

A project built with Jev, a post, a video, a correction, a tip. We open the link, check it says what you said it says, and write the entry ourselves.

Required a link, and an email to reply to. Optional everything else.

Add context — all optional

One or two sentences about what it does, in your words. We write the entry ourselves.

Cost, latency, a benchmark — anything you measured. We attribute these to you.

We store what you type and email it to ourselves. No IP address, no user agent, no referrer — the same rule as the mailing list.

What happens to what you send →