Identical on paper where it counts: both list $2 in / $10 out per million, a ~1M-token window, a 128K output ceiling and text, image and file input. The difference is the vendor line — Anthropic's balanced tier against OpenAI's mid-tier — and the cache price, where Claude's cached read is $0.10 against OpenAI's $0.10.
There is no price argument here, which makes it a rare clean A/B: run your own prompts through both and pick on output. The catalogue's own positioning says Sonnet 5.5 is for well-scoped everyday work and GPT-6.1 Sol for agentic coding and document-heavy professional work — that is a hint about the intended shape of the workload, not a benchmark.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 input and $10.00 output per 1M tokens. GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2.00 input and $10.00 output per 1M tokens.
Which model has the larger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 offers 1M tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol offers 1.05M tokens. Provider-specific limits can vary by route.
Which one should I choose?
There is no price argument here, which makes it a rare clean A/B: run your own prompts through both and pick on output. The catalogue's own positioning says Sonnet 5.5 is for well-scoped everyday work and GPT-6.1 Sol for agentic coding and document-heavy professional work — that is a hint about the intended shape of the workload, not a benchmark.