DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5 is the premium reasoning option, while DeepSeek V4 Pro offers a 1M-token text workflow at a much lower price.

Quick verdict

DeepSeek V4 Pro is attractive for cost-sensitive long-document reasoning. Claude Opus 5 is better when the task is hard enough to justify premium reasoning and agent behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

FieldDeepSeek V4 ProClaude Opus 5
ProviderDeepSeekAnthropic
Context window1.05M tokens1M tokens
Input / 1M$0.579$5.00
Output / 1M$1.74$25.00
ModalitiesTextText, Vision, Files
Best forLong Context, Budget, AgentsOverall, Agents, Coding

Cost estimates

WorkloadInputOutputDeepSeek V4 ProClaude Opus 5
Quick test20,0005,000$0.020$0.225
Product chat month500,000125,000$0.507$5.63
Document batch5,000,0001,000,000$4.64$50.00

Estimates use list input/output prices and exclude cache discounts, provider surcharges and tool fees.

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro if

  • You need 1M-token text reasoning at a lower cost
  • Your workload is research, extraction or document pipelines
  • Cost limits prevent a premium model from being practical
View DeepSeek V4 Pro on OpenRouter

Choose Claude Opus 5 if

  • You need the strongest reasoning in this snapshot
  • Your agents require complex multi-step reliability
  • The cost is justified by task value
View Claude Opus 5 on OpenRouter

FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro cheaper than Claude Opus 5?

DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $0.579 input and $1.74 output per 1M tokens. Claude Opus 5 costs $5.00 input and $25.00 output per 1M tokens.

Which model has the larger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Pro offers 1.05M tokens; Claude Opus 5 offers 1M tokens. Provider-specific limits can vary by route.

Which one should I choose?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is attractive for cost-sensitive long-document reasoning. Claude Opus 5 is better when the task is hard enough to justify premium reasoning and agent behavior.

Pricing and context data are based on a 2026-09-05 snapshot. Provider limits and pricing can change; verify on OpenRouter before production.