Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 supports multimodal input; DeepSeek V4 Flash is text-only but has a lower price and comparable large-context reach.

Quick verdict

MiMo-V2.5 is better for mixed-media long-context work. DeepSeek V4 Flash is the more cost-focused option for pure-text summarization and extraction.

Side-by-side comparison

FieldXiaomi MiMo-V2.5DeepSeek V4 Flash
ProviderXiaomiDeepSeek
Context window1.05M tokens1.31M tokens
Input / 1M$0.140$0.065
Output / 1M$0.280$0.180
ModalitiesText, Vision, Audio, VideoText
Best forLong Context, Budget, MultimodalBudget, Long Context

Cost estimates

WorkloadInputOutputXiaomi MiMo-V2.5DeepSeek V4 Flash
Quick test20,0005,000$0.004$0.002
Product chat month500,000125,000$0.105$0.055
Document batch5,000,0001,000,000$0.980$0.505

Estimates use list input/output prices and exclude cache discounts, provider surcharges and tool fees.

Choose Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 if

  • You need image, audio or video input
  • You want one model across mixed-media analysis
  • Your tests show strong long-context retention for MiMo
View Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 on OpenRouter

Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash if

  • Your workload is text-only and high-volume
  • Cost is the primary constraint
  • You are building document and log summarization pipelines
View DeepSeek V4 Flash on OpenRouter

FAQ

Is Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash?

Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.140 input and $0.280 output per 1M tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.065 input and $0.180 output per 1M tokens.

Which model has the larger context window?

Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 offers 1.05M tokens; DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.31M tokens. Provider-specific limits can vary by route.

Which one should I choose?

MiMo-V2.5 is better for mixed-media long-context work. DeepSeek V4 Flash is the more cost-focused option for pure-text summarization and extraction.

Pricing and context data are based on a 2026-09-05 snapshot. Provider limits and pricing can change; verify on OpenRouter before production.