HunterAlphaHub
OpenRouter model reference Facts from the public catalogue, dated and labelled
Jev Laya Verified
2026-10-10

Head to head · OpenRouter

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Exactly double the price for the same 1M-token window: Opus 5.5 lists $4 / $20 per million against Sonnet 5.5's $2 / $10, and both cap output at 128K with the same input modalities. Cached reads move the same 2x ($0.20 against $0.10).

Comparison Snapshot 2026-10-10 All models compared →

Quick verdict

Inside one family the choice is unusually clean: you are buying the top tier of the same line, and the cliff between them is the point of the lineup. Route the hard 10% of tasks to Opus and the other 90% to Sonnet, and you cut the bill while keeping the ceiling — providing your routing is better than a coin flip.

Side-by-side comparison

Field Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5
Provider Anthropic Anthropic
Context window 1M tokens 1M tokens
Input / 1M $4.00 $2.00
Output / 1M $20.00 $10.00
Modalities Text, Vision, Files Text, Vision, Files
Best for Overall, Coding, Agents Overall, Coding, Agents
Source openrouter.ai/api/v1/models Verified 2026-10-10

Cost estimates

Workload Input Output Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5
Quick test 20,000 5,000 $0.180 $0.090
Product chat month 500,000 125,000 $4.50 $2.25
Document batch 5,000,000 1,000,000 $40.00 $20.00

Estimates use list input/output prices and exclude cache discounts, provider surcharges and tool fees.

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if

  • ✓ The task is a multi-step change in a large codebase where a wrong edit is expensive
  • ✓ It is long-horizon agent work that has to survive its own mistakes
  • ✓ The output is reviewed by a human who costs more than the tokens

View Claude Opus 5.5 on OpenRouter ↗

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 if

  • ✓ The work is well-scoped: a feature, a bug, a rewrite of one file
  • ✓ You are building a product path where most calls are routine
  • ✓ You want the same window and modalities for half the money

View Claude Sonnet 5.5 on OpenRouter ↗

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00 input and $20.00 output per 1M tokens. Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 input and $10.00 output per 1M tokens.

Which model has the larger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5 offers 1M tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 offers 1M tokens. Provider-specific limits can vary by route.

Which one should I choose?

Inside one family the choice is unusually clean: you are buying the top tier of the same line, and the cliff between them is the point of the lineup. Route the hard 10% of tasks to Opus and the other 90% to Sonnet, and you cut the bill while keeping the ceiling — providing your routing is better than a coin flip.

Claude Opus 5.5 details Claude Sonnet 5.5 details Estimate monthly cost

Pricing and context data are based on a 2026-10-10 snapshot. Provider limits and pricing can change; verify on OpenRouter before production.

Send us a link

A project built with Jev, a post, a video, a correction, a tip. We open the link, check it says what you said it says, and write the entry ourselves.

Required a link, and an email to reply to. Optional everything else.

Add context — all optional

One or two sentences about what it does, in your words. We write the entry ourselves.

Cost, latency, a benchmark — anything you measured. We attribute these to you.

We store what you type and email it to ourselves. No IP address, no user agent, no referrer — the same rule as the mailing list.

What happens to what you send →