HunterAlphaHub
OpenRouter model reference Facts from the public catalogue, dated and labelled
Jev Laya Verified
2026-10-16

Head to head · OpenRouter

Muse Wonder vs Claude Opus 5.5

The same price, a different number. Muse Wonder lists $4 in / $20 out per million and so does Claude Opus 5.5, with cached reads at $0.20 for both; Artificial Analysis puts Opus 5.5 at 58 on its Intelligence Index and Muse Wonder at 52, at $5.98 and $4.52 per evaluation task. Meta's own launch table prints a different comparison and a different winner.

Comparison Snapshot 2026-10-16 All models compared →

Quick verdict

For the first time a Meta model is not the cheap option, so the decision stops being about price and becomes about what you actually need: Muse Wonder carries a 943,718-token output ceiling and reads video and audio, which Opus 5.5 does not, while Opus 5.5 leads the independent index. If your workload is long outputs or media in, the ceiling and the modalities may matter more than six index points.

Side-by-side comparison

Field Muse Wonder Claude Opus 5.5
Provider Meta Anthropic
Context window 1.05M tokens 1M tokens
Input / 1M $4.00 $4.00
Output / 1M $20.00 $20.00
Modalities Text, Vision, Audio, Video, Files Text, Vision, Files
Best for Agents, Long Context, Multimodal Overall, Coding, Agents
Source openrouter.ai/api/v1/models Verified 2026-10-16

Cost estimates

Workload Input Output Muse Wonder Claude Opus 5.5
Quick test 20,000 5,000 $0.180 $0.180
Product chat month 500,000 125,000 $4.50 $4.50
Document batch 5,000,000 1,000,000 $40.00 $40.00

Estimates use list input/output prices and exclude cache discounts, provider surcharges and tool fees.

Choose Muse Wonder if

  • ✓ Your output is long — the ceiling is 943,718 tokens against 128,000
  • ✓ You need to feed it video or audio as well as text and images
  • ✓ You want the cheaper cached read per output token at this price

View Muse Wonder on OpenRouter ↗

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if

  • ✓ You want the highest independent score at this price rather than the widest input set
  • ✓ Your workload is multi-step code review and long-horizon agent work
  • ✓ You are already on the Claude line and would rather not add a vendor

View Claude Opus 5.5 on OpenRouter ↗

FAQ

Is Muse Wonder cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5?

Muse Wonder costs $4.00 input and $20.00 output per 1M tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00 input and $20.00 output per 1M tokens.

Which model has the larger context window?

Muse Wonder offers 1.05M tokens; Claude Opus 5.5 offers 1M tokens. Provider-specific limits can vary by route.

Which one should I choose?

For the first time a Meta model is not the cheap option, so the decision stops being about price and becomes about what you actually need: Muse Wonder carries a 943,718-token output ceiling and reads video and audio, which Opus 5.5 does not, while Opus 5.5 leads the independent index. If your workload is long outputs or media in, the ceiling and the modalities may matter more than six index points.

Muse Wonder details Claude Opus 5.5 details Estimate monthly cost

Pricing and context data are based on a 2026-10-16 snapshot. Provider limits and pricing can change; verify on OpenRouter before production.

Send us a link

A project built with Jev, a post, a video, a correction, a tip. We open the link, check it says what you said it says, and write the entry ourselves.

Required a link, and an email to reply to. Optional everything else.

Add context — all optional

One or two sentences about what it does, in your words. We write the entry ourselves.

Cost, latency, a benchmark — anything you measured. We attribute these to you.

We store what you type and email it to ourselves. No IP address, no user agent, no referrer — the same rule as the mailing list.

What happens to what you send →