HunterAlphaHub
OpenRouter model reference Facts from the public catalogue, dated and labelled
Jev Laya Verified
2026-10-10

Stealth line · two front doors

Space Bunny Alpha is gone from OpenRouter — and still on OpenCode

Space Bunny Alpha ran on OpenRouter from 23 September to 2026-10-05 and left without anyone claiming it. Four days later the same codename is still free on OpenCode, and — the part that surprised us — on a price list: OpenCode's Go plan sells "Space Bunny" by the token, beside MiniMax M3 and GLM-5.3-Flash. Nothing here is a reveal. It is a correction to the word "delisted", which needs a platform attached to be true.

Two doors OpenCode read 2026-10-09 OpenCode Zen docs →

The two front doors, today

OpenRouter
Delisted
stealth/space-bunny-alpha stopped resolving on 2026-10-05. No maker named it, then or since.
OpenCode Zen
Free, still listed
The models list still returns space-bunny-free, and the price table still says Free. It is not on OpenCode's deprecated list — which is where retired Claude, Gemini and MiniMax rows go.
OpenCode Go
Sold by the token
The same codename, priced at $0.15 in / $0.60 out per million, with a $30 monthly usage allowance on the $10 plan.

What OpenCode says, field by field

Read from OpenCode's own pages on 2026-10-09 — the keyless models list for the id, the Zen docs for the endpoint and the free price, and the Go page for the paid one.

FieldValue
Model id (Zen)
space-bunny-free
returned by the public models list
Endpoint
https://opencode.ai/zen/v1/chat/completions
OpenAI-compatible chat completions
Price (Zen)
$0 in / $0 out / $0 cached read
per the Zen price table
Deprecated?
No
not on a list that currently carries GPT 5.2 Codex, Claude Opus 4.1, Gemini 3 Pro, MiniMax M2.5, GLM 5
Go price
$0.15 in / $0.60 out
cached read $0.03 per million
Go allowance
$30 / $120
monthly usage on the $10 and $40 plans
Go rate limit
3,130 / 12,500
OpenCode's own estimate of requests per 5 hours

One observation, and what it is worth

The Go plan prints prices for its models side by side, and it prints three that matter to us:

FieldValue
MiniMax M3
$0.30 in / $1.20 out
$60 monthly usage allowance
GLM-5.3-Flash
$0.15 in / $0.50 out
$60 monthly usage allowance
Kimi K3
$3.00 in / $15.00 out
$15 monthly usage allowance
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
$0.14 in / $0.28 out
$60 monthly usage allowance

Space Bunny is its own row with its own price. If it were the same listing as MiniMax M3 or GLM-5.3-Flash on the same platform, a price list would have no reason to carry it twice — so on OpenCode, the name points at a separate model. This is worth exactly that much and no more: a gateway can serve one model under two names, and the MiniMax lead rests on tokenizer counts, not on catalogue bookkeeping. It is recorded because it is checkable, not because it is decisive.

How to check both doors yourself

FieldValue
OpenRouter
Fetch openrouter.ai/api/v1/models and search for stealth/space-bunny-alpha
you will not find it
Our status route
/api/space-bunny-alpha/status
re-reads the OpenRouter catalogue per request; answers online:false
OpenCode Zen
Fetch opencode.ai/zen/v1/models and search for space-bunny-free
no key needed; this is the list we read
Prices
opencode.ai/go
the per-token table and the monthly allowances

FAQ

Is Space Bunny Alpha still available?

On OpenRouter, no — the id stopped resolving on 5 October 2026. On OpenCode, yes, as of 2026-10-09: the free route space-bunny-free is still in the public models list and still priced at zero, and the codename also appears on OpenCode's Go plan as a paid model.

So was it really delisted?

It was delisted from OpenRouter, which is the listing this site tracked. That is a statement about one platform, and the honest version needs the platform named — which is the mistake this page was written to fix.

Does the OpenCode listing tell us who made it?

No. OpenCode does not name the provider either. One small observation is worth recording though: OpenCode's Go plan lists Space Bunny, MiniMax M3 and GLM-5.3-Flash as three separate line items at three separate prices. That is evidence against those two being the same listing on OpenCode — not proof against the tokenizer tests, because a gateway can carry one model under two names. It settles nothing.

Which route should I use?

Neither without reading the terms. The OpenRouter listing said prompts and completions may be retained by the provider and are not used for training; OpenCode's Zen page carries its own privacy section. An anonymous provider plus retained prompts is the sentence that decides whether your data may leave your systems, on either door.

Where this fits

The codename page has the full record — the specs it ran with, the MiniMax identity lead, and the timeline through the delisting. Union Alpha's OpenCode page is the earlier version of this question, and this time the answer is "still there" rather than "reported, and moot".

If this one is ever named, or the next codename appears

A codename that survives on a second platform can be named later than usual — the OpenRouter page is no longer the only place a maker would have to update. One email per reveal.

One email per reveal. No newsletter, no forwarding, unsubscribe in one click.

Send us a link

A project built with Jev, a post, a video, a correction, a tip. We open the link, check it says what you said it says, and write the entry ourselves.

Required a link, and an email to reply to. Optional everything else.

Add context — all optional

One or two sentences about what it does, in your words. We write the entry ourselves.

Cost, latency, a benchmark — anything you measured. We attribute these to you.

We store what you type and email it to ourselves. No IP address, no user agent, no referrer — the same rule as the mailing list.

What happens to what you send →