HunterAlphaHub
OpenRouter model reference Facts from the public catalogue, dated and labelled

GitHub · Serving and API

zhangcy122/OpenJev

Reading a claim about order invariance, with the caveat that 33 stars is not yet a community.

The repository's GitHub card, read on 2026-09-27

What it does

Answers the same three question types as Jev — choice, noul, score — from open models, and adds a distillation loop that keeps reasoning traces that worked as permanent fast paths, so a later call of the same shape skips the exploration. It reports sub-35 ms decisions and perfect option-order invariance on its own benchmark.

The repository's own description: “Self-evolving cognitive decision engine & TypeSafe Jev alternative. Deliberative decision flywheel ('explore first, crystallize later' System 2→1) with 100% option-order invariance. Typed probabilistic API (Choice, Noul, Score) for Open LLMs, Laya (ModernBERT), & commercial Jev with calibrated logprobs and adaptive safety guards.”

How it works

The engine reads calibrated logprobs instead of generated text, normalises them so shuffling the options does not change the answer, and can run fully local or sit in front of a commercial Jev deployment as a guard for borderline classifications.

The repository, by the numbers

Stars
33
Forks
4
Language
Python
Last push
2026-09-26

Read from the GitHub API on 2026-09-27. Stars and the last push move daily — quote them with the date, the way we do.

What we checked

  • the README's benchmark table and the queries it is built on
  • the install line and the licence field GitHub reports
  • the star count and the last-push date, read from the API
  • the advertised modes: pure-local, and a guard in front of a hosted model

What we did not check. We did not install it or run the benchmark, and its table — including the row for TypeSafe's live model — is the author's measurement on a 30-query set rather than ours.

Open the repository ↗All builds

Send us a link

A project built with Jev, a post, a video, a correction, a tip. We open the link, check it says what you said it says, and write the entry ourselves.

Required a link, and an email to reply to. Optional everything else.

Add context — all optional

One or two sentences about what it does, in your words. We write the entry ourselves.

Cost, latency, a benchmark — anything you measured. We attribute these to you.

We store what you type and email it to ourselves. No IP address, no user agent, no referrer — the same rule as the mailing list.

What happens to what you send →